This research paper analyzes survey data from senior investment professionals at mainstream investment organizations to understand ESG information usage. Key findings show investment performance relevance is the primary motivation for ESG use, followed by client demand, product strategy, and ethical considerations. Major impediments include lack of reporting standards, comparability, reliability, and timeliness. The study reveals negative screening is perceived as least beneficial while full integration and engagement are more beneficial. Current ESG practices are driven by product and ethical factors, while future practices focus on investment performance relevance and data reliability concerns.