Summary
This research paper by Mark Diesendorf, Geoff Davies, Thomas Wiedmann, Joachim H. Spangenberg, and Steven Hail presents a systematic critique of neoclassical economics (NCE) from sustainability scientists’ perspectives. The authors examine ten foundational hypotheses of NCE and four additional claims, finding that each fails to meet basic scientific requirements including empirical confirmation, credible assumptions, consistency with Earth system science, and internal consistency.
Relevant SDGs
How to use
Use in ecological economics, economic methodology, or sustainability studies courses. Assign for critical analysis of economic paradigms and their environmental implications. Apply in graduate seminars on alternative economic theories or interdisciplinary sustainability programs. Use for research on economic foundations of environmental policy. Suitable for courses examining science-policy interfaces, economic anthropology, or post-growth economics discussions.
Teaching format tip
Research Article
Provide reading guides focusing on methodology, evidence quality, and logical structure. Students should identify key arguments, evaluate supporting evidence, and assess limitations. Use articles as springboards for generating research questions or comparing methodological approaches. Have students present critical analyses to peers, emphasizing how findings connect to broader theoretical frameworks.
© Copyright 2025 | Sustainability in Academia | Privacy Policy